Analizy Ostatnich Przestępstw

So, "Grozić komuś przemocą na ulicy" or "Grożenie komuś przemocą na ulicy" (gerund form, which might be more common in legal contexts describing an act). The original is "bedreigen", which is an infinitive used as a noun/description of an act. "Grożenie" is the gerund. "Grozić" is the infinitive. Given the context of "legal text", a gerund might be more appropriate to describe the act itself. Let's consider the nuance. "Iemand op straat bedreigen met geweld" describes the act of threatening someone with violence on the street. - "Grożenie komuś przemocą na ulicy" - This is a direct translation using the gerund. - "Grozić komuś przemocą na ulicy" - This is the infinitive, which can also describe an act. In legal contexts, especially for describing offenses, gerunds are very common in Polish. For example, "kradzież" (theft), "rozbój" (robbery). If it were a verb in a sentence, "bedreigen" would be "grozić". But as a standalone phrase describing an act, "grożenie" is often preferred. Let's re-evaluate the original: "Iemand op straat bedreigen met geweld". This is a descriptive phrase, not a full sentence. It describes an action. "Grożenie komuś przemocą na ulicy" fits this perfectly. "Grozić komuś przemocą na ulicy" is also possible, but "Grożenie" feels more like a direct equivalent for the *act* described by the infinitive in Dutch. Final check: "Iemand" -> komuś (dative, as "grozić" takes dative for the person) "op straat" -> na ulicy "bedreigen" -> grożenie (gerund of "grozić") "met geweld" -> przemocą (instrumental, as "grozić czymś" takes instrumental) This seems correct and natural for a legal context.Grożenie komuś przemocą na ulicy

Znieważanie kogoś na tle rasowym.